<![CDATA[So, Sue Me!]]>Civil Litigation gets the spotlight as host Rich Schoenstein - an accomplished Trial Lawyer and Litigator - dissects high-profile lawsuits and breaks down legal issues with the goal of enhancing public access and understanding. Topics span a broad array of private disputes including breach of contract, fraud, defamation, negligence, malpractice, insurance, class actions, and many more. Rich also focusses on the practice, difficulty, and foibles of civil litigation, in the courts and in alternative dispute resolution, with suggestions as to how private disputes can best be resolved.

]]>www.tarterkrinsky.comRiverside.fm (https://riverside.com)Mon, 27 Jul 2026 20:15:23 GMTThu, 20 Nov 2025 15:47:01 GMT60Rich Schoenstein<p>Civil Litigation gets the spotlight as host Rich Schoenstein - an accomplished Trial Lawyer and Litigator - dissects high-profile lawsuits and breaks down legal issues with the goal of enhancing public access and understanding. Topics span a broad array of private disputes including breach of contract, fraud, defamation, negligence, malpractice, insurance, class actions, and many more. Rich also focusses on the practice, difficulty, and foibles of civil litigation, in the courts and in alternative dispute resolution, with suggestions as to how private disputes can best be resolved. </p>episodicRich Schoensteinrichschoenstein@gmail.comno<![CDATA[Luigi Mangione Withdraws Defense - Or Does He?]]>There is confusion about a one sentence letter submitted by counsel for Luigi Mangione, seemingly reversing news reported yesterday that he would pursue an extreme emotional disturbance defense. Rich explains the letter, the relevant provisions of CPL § 250.10, what was and wasn't withdrawn, and what it might mean going forward. Plus, he shows off his new haircut - although you can't see that on the audio.

]]>7604e6af-edd5-447a-9c3e-374456c86e97Fri, 19 Jun 2026 20:18:29 GMT<p>There is confusion about a one sentence letter submitted by counsel for Luigi Mangione, seemingly reversing news reported yesterday that he would pursue an extreme emotional disturbance defense. Rich explains the letter, the relevant provisions of CPL § 250.10, what was and wasn't withdrawn, and what it might mean going forward. Plus, he shows off his new haircut - although you can't see that on the audio.<br /><br /></p>no00:12:36126Luigi Mangione Withdraws Defense - Or Does He?full<![CDATA[Truth or Fiction? Alleged Sex Slave Accused of Defamation in LevFin Civil Litigation Melee]]>In one of the crazier cases you will find, a former JPMorgan Chase & Co. employee has sued the bank and his alleged former superior, claiming he was made a sex slave, sexually assaulted, discriminated and retaliated against, etc. The former fellow employee he has sued has counterclaimed, asserting that it is all untrue and defamatory. And thus, a salacious and hotly contested dispute is born. Rich goes over the claims on both sides, the current status of the case, what to make of the defamation claims, and how it is likely to play out moving ahead.

An in-depth analysis of a complex civil litigation case involving allegations of sexual assault, discrimination, and defamation within the financial sector. The discussion covers legal strategies, case progression, and the importance of credibility in court.

]]>4adef9d5-ee54-459b-8f0d-16b0864270b7Sun, 24 May 2026 15:00:59 GMT<p>In one of the crazier cases you will find, a former JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. employee has sued the bank and his alleged former superior, claiming he was made a sex slave, sexually assaulted, discriminated and retaliated against, etc. The former fellow employee he has sued has counterclaimed, asserting that it is all untrue and defamatory. And thus, a salacious and hotly contested dispute is born. Rich goes over the claims on both sides, the current status of the case, what to make of the defamation claims, and how it is likely to play out moving ahead.<br /><br />An in-depth analysis of a complex civil litigation case involving allegations of sexual assault, discrimination, and defamation within the financial sector. The discussion covers legal strategies, case progression, and the importance of credibility in court.</p><p></p>no00:18:10125Truth or Fiction? Alleged Sex Slave Accused of Defamation in LevFin Civil Litigation Meleefull<![CDATA[Luigi Mangione - Unpacking the Backpack Decision]]>The judge in the state court prosecution has ruled on the admissibility of the contents of the backpack that was located at the time of Luigi Mangione's arrest. Rich goes through the contents of the decision to explain what can come into evidence, what is excluded, and which side "won" the ruling. Rich also considers the implications for the continuing state and federal prosecutions and two trials scheduled for the near future.

]]>b511fc17-2a26-4581-8dc9-9f9d47102574Mon, 18 May 2026 21:04:32 GMT<p>The judge in the state court prosecution has ruled on the admissibility of the contents of the backpack that was located at the time of Luigi Mangione's arrest. Rich goes through the contents of the decision to explain what can come into evidence, what is excluded, and which side "won" the ruling. Rich also considers the implications for the continuing state and federal prosecutions and two trials scheduled for the near future.</p>no00:13:37124Luigi Mangione - Unpacking the Backpack Decisionfull<![CDATA[Kouri and Alex - Turning Points in Two Criminal Convictions]]>Kouri Richins has been sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, following a sentencing hearing where she behaved abhorrently and gave a stunningly dumb presentation to the court. Alex Murdaugh did better, as his convictions for murder have been reversed on appeal. Rich takes a look at both of these cases, what happened at the sentencing hearing, and how a court clerk derailed a murder conviction.

]]>881b57ef-06ed-49eb-b335-f8bc059e67a4Fri, 15 May 2026 14:10:22 GMT<p>Kouri Richins has been sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, following a sentencing hearing where she behaved abhorrently and gave a stunningly dumb presentation to the court. Alex Murdaugh did better, as his convictions for murder have been reversed on appeal. Rich takes a look at both of these cases, what happened at the sentencing hearing, and how a court clerk derailed a murder conviction.</p>no00:16:51123Kouri and Alex - Turning Points in Two Criminal Convictionsfull<![CDATA[The Karen Read Witnesses and Kash Patel Defamation Cases - the Lawfare Panel Digs In]]>Continuing the trend of defamation cases over the past few years, four witnesses from the Karen Read criminal case have brought a defamation action against Ms. Read and the podcaster/journalist known as Turtleboy, while FBI Director Kash Patel has sued the Atlantic and its reporter Sarah Fitzpatrick. Assembled on the Lawfare field of battle, legal analysts Terri Austin, Marie Pereira, and Joe Richardson join host Rich Schoenstein to discuss both cases, what makes them different, and how they might play out over the years to come.

]]>047d54ba-de42-4f7d-ba12-14c234e5f9e5Thu, 30 Apr 2026 14:39:36 GMT<p>Continuing the trend of defamation cases over the past few years, four witnesses from the Karen Read criminal case have brought a defamation action against Ms. Read and the podcaster/journalist known as Turtleboy, while FBI Director Kash Patel has sued the Atlantic and its reporter Sarah Fitzpatrick. Assembled on the Lawfare field of battle, legal analysts Terri Austin, Marie Pereira, and Joe Richardson join host Rich Schoenstein to discuss both cases, what makes them different, and how they might play out over the years to come.</p>no00:41:42122The Karen Read Witnesses and Kash Patel Defamation Cases - the Lawfare Panel Digs Infull<![CDATA[Karen Read and Turtleboy Sued for Defamation]]>Another chapter opens in the Karen Read saga, as she and online personality Aidan Kearney (a/k;a Turtleboy) are sued by Jennifer McCabe, Brian Albert, Colin Albert, and Brian Higgins for defamation and related causes of action. Rich takes a first look at the Complaint, the claims, and the issues that are likely to be the focus of this litigation.

]]>abb3ef68-b68e-4223-a6be-e10d7037afa1Mon, 20 Apr 2026 19:42:39 GMT<p>Another chapter opens in the Karen Read saga, as she and online personality Aidan Kearney (a/k;a Turtleboy) are sued by Jennifer McCabe, Brian Albert, Colin Albert, and Brian Higgins for defamation and related causes of action. Rich takes a first look at the Complaint, the claims, and the issues that are likely to be the focus of this litigation.</p>no00:22:09121Karen Read and Turtleboy Sued for Defamationfull<![CDATA[Lawfare - The Game: Premiere Episode]]>Lawfare - The Game: the true crime online legal analyst panel discussion that is guilty on all counts. This week's panelists are Dave Aronberg, Sunny Slaughter and Josh Schiffer. They take on:

  • The Gilgo Beach guilty pleas and potential civil litigation
  • Luigi Mangione's dual (and competing) prosecutions
  • Blake Lively v. Justin Baldoni - upcoming trial

Play Law!

]]>8082b202-efdb-4499-9412-643c334f580bFri, 17 Apr 2026 01:09:39 GMT<p>Lawfare - The Game: the true crime online legal analyst panel discussion that is guilty on all counts. This week's panelists are Dave Aronberg, Sunny Slaughter and Josh Schiffer. They take on:<br /></p><ul><li>The Gilgo Beach guilty pleas and potential civil litigation<br /></li><li>Luigi Mangione's dual (and competing) prosecutions<br /></li><li>Blake Lively v. Justin Baldoni - upcoming trial<br /></li></ul><p>Play Law!</p>no00:33:03120Lawfare - The Game: Premiere Episodefull<![CDATA[Blake Lively v. Justin Baldoni - Mostly Dismissed But Heading to Trial]]>Checking in on the latest in the Blake Lively vs Justin Baldoni lawsuit, as most of her claims are dismissed by the Court. Rich looks at the legal strategies, case developments, and implications for celebrity litigation.

]]>130f7215-218f-4e49-8b34-58b78c9c7486Tue, 07 Apr 2026 13:24:16 GMT<p>Checking in on the latest in the Blake Lively vs Justin Baldoni lawsuit, as most of her claims are dismissed by the Court. Rich looks at the legal strategies, case developments, and implications for celebrity litigation.</p>no00:18:59119Blake Lively v. Justin Baldoni - Mostly Dismissed But Heading to Trialfull<![CDATA[The Continuing Race to Try Luigi Mangione]]>The Federal court has moved it's trial date back, very slightly, but Luigi Mangione still faces the prospects of two murder trials this year. Rich unpacks the latest court proceedings, the current schedule, the potential double jeopardy implications, Mangione's right to a fair trial, and Rich's view that the dual prosecutions of Mangione are tripping over themselves by failing to cooperate and overcharging the case, thus endangering what should be a straightforward prosecution.

]]>bfcd34ca-3869-41b8-9fb0-9c829623ae5bFri, 03 Apr 2026 16:40:31 GMT<p>The Federal court has moved it's trial date back, very slightly, but Luigi Mangione still faces the prospects of two murder trials this year. Rich unpacks the latest court proceedings, the current schedule, the potential double jeopardy implications, Mangione's right to a fair trial, and Rich's view that the dual prosecutions of Mangione are tripping over themselves by failing to cooperate and overcharging the case, thus endangering what should be a straightforward prosecution.</p>no00:15:22118The Continuing Race to Try Luigi Mangionefull<![CDATA[What the Heck is Law&Crime+? Plus Two Social Media Verdicts]]>The fallout from the Law&Crime Network's acquisition of CourtTV continues, with positive reports from the acquirors, and the launch of the new service Law&Crime+. Rich talks about the latest developments and the continuing reaction to changes at CourtTV. In addition, juries in New Mexico and California rendered verdicts this week holding social media companies liable for injuring teens. Rich goes over the verdicts and whether they are true bellwethers of what lies ahead.

Ask

]]>0f725e76-7d46-48b4-b587-b5fc9827d3e8Thu, 26 Mar 2026 21:40:15 GMT<p>The fallout from the Law&amp;Crime Network's acquisition of CourtTV continues, with positive reports from the acquirors, and the launch of the new service Law&amp;Crime+. Rich talks about the latest developments and the continuing reaction to changes at CourtTV. In addition, juries in New Mexico and California rendered verdicts this week holding social media companies liable for injuring teens. Rich goes over the verdicts and whether they are true bellwethers of what lies ahead.</p><h2><b>Ask</b></h2>no00:16:03117What the Heck is Law&Crime+? Plus Two Social Media Verdictsfull<![CDATA[What's Happening at CourtTV?!]]>The landscape has changed at CourtTV following its acquisition by the Law & Crime Network. Rich is joined by legal analysts Josh Schiffer and Franz Borghardt to discuss the merger, the new landscape, and what lies ahead. The three analysts talk about their experiences on the two networks, the true crime community, and the value of on-air legal analysis.

Ask

]]>b8cdbfcd-aba9-4a04-9c3d-2047aa20479aWed, 18 Mar 2026 12:10:26 GMT<p>The landscape has changed at CourtTV following its acquisition by the Law &amp; Crime Network. Rich is joined by legal analysts Josh Schiffer and Franz Borghardt to discuss the merger, the new landscape, and what lies ahead. The three analysts talk about their experiences on the two networks, the true crime community, and the value of on-air legal analysis.</p><h2><b>Ask</b></h2>no00:32:03116What's Happening at CourtTV?!full<![CDATA[Social Media on Trial - Mark Zuckerberg Testifies in Landmark Case]]>Meta and YouTube are on trial in California, where a plaintiff alleges that the sites were addictive and harmful. The trial is a bellwether for some 1,600 consolidated cases and many more filed in other state. Mark Zuckerberg himself was questioned about Meta's knowledge and culpability, in a legal matter that may help frame societal norms for social media companies going forward. Rich discusses the claims and the much broader implications.

]]>ce312fec-264a-4597-ba7d-c8758e5f5492Fri, 20 Feb 2026 21:08:55 GMT<p>Meta and YouTube are on trial in California, where a plaintiff alleges that the sites were addictive and harmful. The trial is a bellwether for some 1,600 consolidated cases and many more filed in other state. Mark Zuckerberg himself was questioned about Meta's knowledge and culpability, in a legal matter that may help frame societal norms for social media companies going forward. Rich discusses the claims and the much broader implications.</p>no00:14:48115Social Media on Trial - Mark Zuckerberg Testifies in Landmark Casefull<![CDATA[Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni Did Not Settle - How Do You Settle a Civil Case?]]>Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni had a settlement conference but did not settle their case. Can they ever? In this episode of 'So Sue Me', Rich Schoenstein discusses settlements in civil litigation, using the Lively and Baldoni case as a backdrop. He explains the reasons why most civil cases settle before reaching trial, the processes involved in reaching a settlement, and the various outcomes that can arise from settlement discussions. Rich emphasizes the importance of having a strategy for both settlement and trial, highlighting that the uncertainty of trial outcomes often drives parties to seek resolution through negotiation.

]]>51acf569-c22b-4e34-9dcc-7bb571c94350Sun, 15 Feb 2026 14:11:34 GMT<p>Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni had a settlement conference but did not settle their case. Can they ever? In this episode of 'So Sue Me', Rich Schoenstein discusses settlements in civil litigation, using the Lively and Baldoni case as a backdrop. He explains the reasons why most civil cases settle before reaching trial, the processes involved in reaching a settlement, and the various outcomes that can arise from settlement discussions. Rich emphasizes the importance of having a strategy for both settlement and trial, highlighting that the uncertainty of trial outcomes often drives parties to seek resolution through negotiation.<br /><br /></p>no00:18:27114Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni Did Not Settle - How Do You Settle a Civil Case?full<![CDATA[The Race to Convict Luigi Mangione - the State Court Sets a June 8 Trial Date]]>Luigi Mangione is facing trial for the murder of Brian Thompson in both New York State and New York Federal Court. The proceedings have raised concerns about the timing, preparation, and fairness of the trials, as well as the overcharging and double jeopardy issues. These concerns were heightened by the recent scheduling of the state court trial for June 8, 2026, just three months before jury selection is set to begin in the federal case.

Takeaways

  • Double jeopardy and overcharging are key concerns in the prosecution of Luigi Mangione.
  • The timing and preparation of the trials, as well as the fairness of the proceedings, are significant points of contention.

Chapters

  • 00:00 Setting the Trial Date
  • 07:11 State vs. Federal Prosecution
  • 14:07 Double Jeopardy and Trial Proceedings
]]>af547ffa-54aa-47fa-8f61-113429bbf408Sat, 07 Feb 2026 13:50:30 GMT<p>Luigi Mangione is facing trial for the murder of Brian Thompson in both New York State and New York Federal Court. The proceedings have raised concerns about the timing, preparation, and fairness of the trials, as well as the overcharging and double jeopardy issues. These concerns were heightened by the recent scheduling of the state court trial for June 8, 2026, just three months before jury selection is set to begin in the federal case.</p><p></p><p>Takeaways</p><ul><li>Double jeopardy and overcharging are key concerns in the prosecution of Luigi Mangione.</li><li>The timing and preparation of the trials, as well as the fairness of the proceedings, are significant points of contention.</li></ul><p></p><p>Chapters</p><ul><li>00:00 Setting the Trial Date</li><li>07:11 State vs. Federal Prosecution</li><li>14:07 Double Jeopardy and Trial Proceedings</li></ul>no00:15:30113The Race to Convict Luigi Mangione - the State Court Sets a June 8 Trial Datefull<![CDATA[Backpack In; Death Penalty Out - Big Developments in the Luigi Mangione Case]]>Last week's blockbuster rulings in the Federal prosecution of Luigi Mangione eliminated charges that could be punishable by death - although prosecutors may appeal that - and ruled that the backpack and its contents are admissible as evidence. Rich discussed the reasoning in their decisions and how they will impact the case.

Takeaways

  • Death penalty charges dismissed
  • Backpack evidence admissible

Chapters

  • 00:00 Federal Court Decision on Death Penalty
  • 09:05 Admissibility of Backpack Evidence
  • 18:27 Political Motivation and Trial Schedule
]]>4b0c2338-4de9-4704-8086-47d3ba72a467Mon, 02 Feb 2026 15:51:31 GMT<p>Last week's blockbuster rulings in the Federal prosecution of Luigi Mangione eliminated charges that could be punishable by death - although prosecutors may appeal that - and ruled that the backpack and its contents are admissible as evidence. Rich discussed the reasoning in their decisions and how they will impact the case.</p><p></p><p>Takeaways</p><ul><li>Death penalty charges dismissed</li><li>Backpack evidence admissible</li></ul><p></p><p>Chapters</p><ul><li>00:00 Federal Court Decision on Death Penalty</li><li>09:05 Admissibility of Backpack Evidence</li><li>18:27 Political Motivation and Trial Schedule</li></ul>no00:17:51112Backpack In; Death Penalty Out - Big Developments in the Luigi Mangione Casefull<![CDATA[Duke Sues Its Quarterback - Is the Lawsuit Offsides?]]>Duke University commenced arbitration and a lawsuit against its quarterback, Darian Mensah, over his entry into the college football portal and potential transfer to the University of Miami. The case raises important issues concerning the enforceability of written contracts, the ability to seek injunctive relief in court in the aid of arbitration, and whether injunctive relief is merited. Rich takes a look at the pleadings and the issues raised by this developing case.

Takeaways

  • Importance of Contracts
  • Challenges of Obtaining Injunctions
  • Civil Litigation and Arbitration


Chapters

  • 00:00 Introduction
  • 05:22 Duke University's Lawsuit
  • 12:07 Duke's Legal Strategy
  • 17:07 Request for Injunction
  • 22:41 Arbitration and Confidentiality


Keywords

Contract, breach, arbitration, temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, Mensah, Duke, Miami, college football

]]>808fdbc8-d1fb-4db4-9d18-29a9c266f240Wed, 21 Jan 2026 19:10:11 GMT<p>Duke University commenced arbitration and a lawsuit against its quarterback, Darian Mensah, over his entry into the college football portal and potential transfer to the University of Miami. The case raises important issues concerning the enforceability of written contracts, the ability to seek injunctive relief in court in the aid of arbitration, and whether injunctive relief is merited. Rich takes a look at the pleadings and the issues raised by this developing case.<br /><br />Takeaways<br /></p><ul><li>Importance of Contracts<br /></li><li>Challenges of Obtaining Injunctions<br /></li><li>Civil Litigation and Arbitration<br /></li></ul><p><br />Chapters<br /></p><ul><li><a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcgjwQqK750">00:00</a> Introduction<br /></li><li><a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcgjwQqK750&amp;t=322s">05:22</a> Duke University's Lawsuit<br /></li><li><a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcgjwQqK750&amp;t=727s">12:07</a> Duke's Legal Strategy<br /></li><li><a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcgjwQqK750&amp;t=1027s">17:07</a> Request for Injunction<br /></li><li><a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcgjwQqK750&amp;t=1361s">22:41</a> Arbitration and Confidentiality<br /></li></ul><p><br />Keywords<br /><br />Contract, breach, arbitration, temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, Mensah, Duke, Miami, college football</p>no00:24:04111Duke Sues Its Quarterback - Is the Lawsuit Offsides?full<![CDATA[Luigi Mangione Back in Court - Death Penalty at Issue]]>Luigi Mangione is headed back to federal court, with key motions pending challenging the possibility of the death penalty and seeking to suppress evidence. Rich Schoenstein provides insights into the legal strategies employed by the defense and the pending motions, emphasizing the importance of due process and the presumption of innocence.

]]>e2a142e6-bf12-445c-a347-d6467e718d57Thu, 08 Jan 2026 22:47:56 GMT<p>Luigi Mangione is headed back to federal court, with key motions pending challenging the possibility of the death penalty and seeking to suppress evidence. Rich Schoenstein provides insights into the legal strategies employed by the defense and the pending motions, emphasizing the importance of due process and the presumption of innocence.</p>no00:20:24110Luigi Mangione Back in Court - Death Penalty at Issuefull<![CDATA[Litigation Funding Gets New Limits in New York]]>This episode discusses the newly enacted Consumer Litigation Funding Act in New York, which aims to regulate litigation funding practices. The law introduces a 25% cap on the recovery amount for funding companies and outlines various consumer protections, including clear contract disclosures and attorney responsibilities. The conversation explores the implications of this law on the litigation funding landscape, the economic impact on funding companies, and the overall benefits for consumers seeking legal funding.

See the bill at: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/A804/amendment/C#:~:text=Enacts%20the%20consumer%20litigation%20funding,of%20their%20case%3B%20makes%20related

]]>d2f60a04-6776-4a6c-a92e-3ae682a3113cFri, 26 Dec 2025 13:55:14 GMT<p>This episode discusses the newly enacted Consumer Litigation Funding Act in New York, which aims to regulate litigation funding practices. The law introduces a 25% cap on the recovery amount for funding companies and outlines various consumer protections, including clear contract disclosures and attorney responsibilities. The conversation explores the implications of this law on the litigation funding landscape, the economic impact on funding companies, and the overall benefits for consumers seeking legal funding. </p><p></p><p>See the bill at: <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/A804/amendment/C#:~:text=Enacts%20the%20consumer%20litigation%20funding,of%20their%20case%3B%20makes%20related" target="_blank">https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/A804/amendment/C#:~:text=Enacts%20the%20consumer%20litigation%20funding,of%20their%20case%3B%20makes%20related</a> <br /></p>no00:18:4319Litigation Funding Gets New Limits in New Yorkfull<![CDATA[Luigi Mangione Evidentiary Rulings - Coming Next May!]]>Can a backpack make or break a case?

This week on So Sue Me, we unpack the pending evidentiary battle surrounding Luigi Mangione's backpack, which allegedly holds crucial evidence against him. We discuss the procedural status, with no decision on the evidence expected until May 2026, and the substance of the issues.

#LuigiMangione #Evidence #backpack #SoSueMe #Schoetime #TrueCrime

]]>6784fcc1-140e-43d2-8f23-72919fcfc17aMon, 22 Dec 2025 14:38:33 GMT<p>Can a backpack make or break a case?</p><p></p><p>This week on So Sue Me, we unpack the pending evidentiary battle surrounding Luigi Mangione's backpack, which allegedly holds crucial evidence against him. We discuss the procedural status, with no decision on the evidence expected until May 2026, and the substance of the issues.</p><p></p><p>#LuigiMangione #Evidence #backpack #SoSueMe #Schoetime #TrueCrime</p>no00:15:2218Luigi Mangione Evidentiary Rulings - Coming Next May!full<![CDATA[No, I Won't Take Your Civil Case on Contingency. Here's Why.]]>In this episode, Rich Schoenstein discusses the complexities of contingency cases in civil litigation. He explains why many lawyers, including himself, are hesitant to take on business cases on a contingency basis, highlighting the financial risks involved, the importance of case evaluation, and the need for clients to be well-prepared. Rich also offers insights into the challenges of navigating the legal system and the significance of understanding the defendant's financial situation.

Takeaways

Contingency cases are often sought due to the high costs of civil litigation.

Not all cases that seem strong are legally actionable.

Clients' enthusiasm can sometimes cloud their judgment about their case's strength.

The judicial system can be unpredictable, affecting case outcomes.

The financial condition of the defendant is crucial in contingency cases.

Preparation and evidence collection are vital for clients seeking legal representation.

Clients should be willing to invest in their case to show commitment.

Active client involvement is essential in the litigation process.

Chapters: 00:00 Understanding Contingency Cases 08:54 Challenges in Contingency Litigation 12:08 Navigating the Legal Landscape 15:20 Preparing for Legal Representation

Keywords: contingency, civil litigation, legal representation, business disputes, legal fees, litigation funding, client preparation, attorney-client relationship, legal challenges, case evaluation


]]>4d4afae9-5234-45e0-9db7-0a69e360ab11Fri, 12 Dec 2025 22:04:24 GMT<p>In this episode, Rich Schoenstein discusses the complexities of contingency cases in civil litigation. He explains why many lawyers, including himself, are hesitant to take on business cases on a contingency basis, highlighting the financial risks involved, the importance of case evaluation, and the need for clients to be well-prepared. Rich also offers insights into the challenges of navigating the legal system and the significance of understanding the defendant's financial situation.</p><p></p><p>Takeaways</p><p></p><p>Contingency cases are often sought due to the high costs of civil litigation.</p><p>Not all cases that seem strong are legally actionable.</p><p>Clients' enthusiasm can sometimes cloud their judgment about their case's strength.</p><p>The judicial system can be unpredictable, affecting case outcomes.</p><p>The financial condition of the defendant is crucial in contingency cases.</p><p>Preparation and evidence collection are vital for clients seeking legal representation.</p><p>Clients should be willing to invest in their case to show commitment.</p><p>Active client involvement is essential in the litigation process.</p><p></p><p>Chapters: <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDjzP6KC11w">00:00</a> Understanding Contingency Cases <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDjzP6KC11w&amp;t=534s">08:54</a> Challenges in Contingency Litigation <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDjzP6KC11w&amp;t=728s">12:08</a> Navigating the Legal Landscape <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDjzP6KC11w&amp;t=920s">15:20</a> Preparing for Legal Representation</p><p></p><p>Keywords: contingency, civil litigation, legal representation, business disputes, legal fees, litigation funding, client preparation, attorney-client relationship, legal challenges, case evaluation</p><h2><b><br /></b></h2>no00:15:3817No, I Won't Take Your Civil Case on Contingency. Here's Why.full<![CDATA[Breach of Contract Basics]]>In this episode of So Sue Me!, Rich Schoenstein delves into the fundamental concepts of contracts and breach of contract. He explains the essential elements required to establish a breach of contract claim and what constitutes a contract. Rich emphasizes that contracts do not always need to be in writing, although written agreements provide clarity and enforceability. He discusses the importance of understanding contract terms, the implications of breach, and best practices for entering into contracts, including the need for legal advice and keeping copies of important agreements. The episode concludes with a reminder of the significance of contracts in everyday life and the importance of protecting one's legal rights.

Chapters: 00:00 Introduction to Breach of Contract 00:38 The Elements of a Breach of Contract Claim 02:39 What Constitutes a Valid Contract? 05:24 There Are Contracts Everywhere 06:59 Interpreting Contracts and Ambiguities 08:42 Key Terms and Provisions in Contracts 11:15 Practical Tips for Navigating Contracts 15:26 Conclusion and Final Thoughts on Contracts 16:42 Outro

Keywords: contract, breach of contract, legal education, civil litigation, contract law, legal agreements, contract interpretation, damages, enforceable contracts, legal rights

]]>4d9621d2-6838-411e-9c2a-466cfe62b384Thu, 04 Dec 2025 22:44:06 GMT<p>In this episode of So Sue Me!, Rich Schoenstein delves into the fundamental concepts of contracts and breach of contract. He explains the essential elements required to establish a breach of contract claim and what constitutes a contract. Rich emphasizes that contracts do not always need to be in writing, although written agreements provide clarity and enforceability. He discusses the importance of understanding contract terms, the implications of breach, and best practices for entering into contracts, including the need for legal advice and keeping copies of important agreements. The episode concludes with a reminder of the significance of contracts in everyday life and the importance of protecting one's legal rights. </p><p></p><p>Chapters: <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQoX9j_pvEE">00:00</a> Introduction to Breach of Contract <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQoX9j_pvEE&amp;t=38s">00:38</a> The Elements of a Breach of Contract Claim <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQoX9j_pvEE&amp;t=159s">02:39</a> What Constitutes a Valid Contract? <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQoX9j_pvEE&amp;t=324s">05:24</a> There Are Contracts Everywhere <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQoX9j_pvEE&amp;t=419s">06:59</a> Interpreting Contracts and Ambiguities <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQoX9j_pvEE&amp;t=522s">08:42</a> Key Terms and Provisions in Contracts <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQoX9j_pvEE&amp;t=675s">11:15</a> Practical Tips for Navigating Contracts <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQoX9j_pvEE&amp;t=926s">15:26</a> Conclusion and Final Thoughts on Contracts <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQoX9j_pvEE&amp;t=1002s">16:42</a> Outro </p><p></p><p>Keywords: contract, breach of contract, legal education, civil litigation, contract law, legal agreements, contract interpretation, damages, enforceable contracts, legal rights</p>no00:16:4716Breach of Contract Basicsfull<![CDATA[Removal to Federal Court - How Karen Read's Civil Case Changed Forums]]>The civil case brought by Karen Read has been removed to federal court. Rich digs in on this strategic maneuver, discussing federal jurisdiction in civil cases, the removal process, why a litigant might want to be in federal court and why these particular defendants may have decided to move the case. Rich explains the nuances of federal question jurisdiction and the potential advantages of federal court over state court, including efficiency and jury composition. The discussion also highlights the complexities of the ongoing litigation involving multiple parties and cases, emphasizing the chess-like nature of civil litigation. Keywords Karen Read, federal court, civil litigation, jurisdiction, legal strategy, federal question jurisdiction, removal to federal court, civil rights claims, legal proceedings, Massachusetts

]]>95dda060-0073-4566-87f8-52cd5df202bcTue, 02 Dec 2025 01:30:36 GMT<p>The civil case brought by Karen Read has been removed to federal court. Rich digs in on this strategic maneuver, discussing federal jurisdiction in civil cases, the removal process, why a litigant might want to be in federal court and why these particular defendants may have decided to move the case. Rich explains the nuances of federal question jurisdiction and the potential advantages of federal court over state court, including efficiency and jury composition. The discussion also highlights the complexities of the ongoing litigation involving multiple parties and cases, emphasizing the chess-like nature of civil litigation. Keywords Karen Read, federal court, civil litigation, jurisdiction, legal strategy, federal question jurisdiction, removal to federal court, civil rights claims, legal proceedings, Massachusetts <br /></p>no00:16:0715Removal to Federal Court - How Karen Read's Civil Case Changed Forumsfull<![CDATA[Karen Read III - Civil War]]>The Karen Read case is in civil litigation and, accordingly, we discuss it on the podcast about civil litigation. Rich Schoenstein provides an overview of the prior legal proceedings, the divided public opinion, the outcomes of the criminal trials, and the subsequent civil lawsuits filed by both the O'Keefe family and Karen Read. The episode also discusses the implications of fundraising efforts by both parties and the differences between civil and criminal litigation, emphasizing the challenges and potential outcomes of the ongoing legal battles.

]]>5e6f5ace-568e-4f00-be4b-ee8a79d570a9Tue, 25 Nov 2025 13:14:18 GMT<p>The Karen Read case is in civil litigation and, accordingly, we discuss it on the podcast about civil litigation. Rich Schoenstein provides an overview of the prior legal proceedings, the divided public opinion, the outcomes of the criminal trials, and the subsequent civil lawsuits filed by both the O'Keefe family and Karen Read. The episode also discusses the implications of fundraising efforts by both parties and the differences between civil and criminal litigation, emphasizing the challenges and potential outcomes of the ongoing legal battles.</p>no00:24:3114Karen Read III - Civil Warfull<![CDATA[Alienation of Affection and Criminal Conversation = A $1.75 Million Verdict]]>Alienation of affection and criminal conversation - two uncommon civil law claims - were at issue in Akira Montague v. Brenay Kennard, a North Carolina lawsuit in which the plaintiff sued a TikTok star for allegedly having an affair with plaintiff's husband, resulting in a jury awarding her $1.75 million. Rich breaks down the legal concepts, jury instructions, and implications of the verdict, while also emphasizing the importance of legal representation in civil litigation.

]]>a1ea222e-5410-4ac6-8e5f-ddeed3e9bf36Sun, 23 Nov 2025 00:54:49 GMT<p>Alienation of affection and criminal conversation - two uncommon civil law claims - were at issue in Akira Montague v. Brenay Kennard, a North Carolina lawsuit in which the plaintiff sued a TikTok star for allegedly having an affair with plaintiff's husband, resulting in a jury awarding her $1.75 million. Rich breaks down the legal concepts, jury instructions, and implications of the verdict, while also emphasizing the importance of legal representation in civil litigation.<br /></p>no00:16:1713Alienation of Affection and Criminal Conversation = A $1.75 Million Verdictfull<![CDATA[O.J. Simpson's Victims Are NOT Getting $58 Million]]>This edition of "So, Sue Me!" delves into the O.J. Simpson case, of all things, focusing on the recent developments regarding his estate. Rich Schoenstein discusses the media's portrayal of supposed agreement to honor a $58 million claim by Fred Goldman, the father of Ron Goldman, and clarifies the realities of the situation. It is an agreement on amount, not payment, and there are substantial challenges to recovering anything. Still, the civil side of the O.J. case has lessons to be learned.

]]>d4bf3238-63bb-433c-a6f6-22cd8a200ab0Fri, 21 Nov 2025 13:45:25 GMT<p>This edition of "So, Sue Me!" delves into the O.J. Simpson case, of all things, focusing on the recent developments regarding his estate. Rich Schoenstein discusses the media's portrayal of supposed agreement to honor a $58 million claim by Fred Goldman, the father of Ron Goldman, and clarifies the realities of the situation. It is an agreement on amount, not payment, and there are substantial challenges to recovering anything. Still, the civil side of the O.J. case has lessons to be learned.</p>no00:09:1212O.J. Simpson's Victims Are NOT Getting $58 Millionfull<![CDATA[A Podcast About Civil Litigation]]>Civil litigation is front and center in this new podcast from Trial Lawyer / Legal Analyst Rich Schoenstein and Tarter Krinsky & Drogin. Rich explains the who, what, where, when, and why of this endeavor, shares a few clips of his prior appearances on civil litigation matters, and sets the course for future topics. May it please the listeners!

]]>6fad6e9d-8bc0-4ffc-bd3a-2130ed60559cFri, 21 Nov 2025 01:12:40 GMT<p>Civil litigation is front and center in this new podcast from Trial Lawyer / Legal Analyst Rich Schoenstein and Tarter Krinsky &amp; Drogin. Rich explains the who, what, where, when, and why of this endeavor, shares a few clips of his prior appearances on civil litigation matters, and sets the course for future topics. May it please the listeners!</p>no00:09:5311A Podcast About Civil Litigationfull